Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] ekiga from 2008 06 16 failed to build (all arch)
- From: Eugen Dedu <Eugen Dedu pu-pm univ-fcomte fr>
- To: Ekiga development mailing list <ekiga-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] ekiga from 2008 06 16 failed to build (all arch)
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:12:41 +0200
yannick wrote:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../src -I../src/clients/
-I../src/components/ -I../src/devices/ -I../src/endpoints/ -I../src/gui/
-I../lib -I../lib/gmconf -I../lib/gui -I../lib/engine/
-I../lib/engine/gui/gtk-frontend -I../lib/engine/addressbook/skel
-I../lib/engine/chat/skel -I../lib/engine/presence/skel
-I../lib/engine/protocol/skel -I../lib/engine/protocol/sip
-I../lib/engine/videooutput/skel -I../lib/engine/videoinput/skel
-I../lib/engine/audioinput/skel -I../lib/engine/audiooutput/skel
-I../lib/engine/hal/skel -I../lib/engine/framework -I.. -DSCHEMA_AGE=61
-I../lib/engine/videooutput/common -I../lib/engine/videooutput/x
-DPNG_NO_MMX_CODE -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/pixman-1
-pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-DORBIT2=1 -pthread -DPNG_NO_MMX_CODE -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0
-I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2
-I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0
-I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0
-I/usr/include/gnome-keyring-1 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0
-I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/gail-1.0
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/atk-1.0
-I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/libpng12
-I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0
-I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/opal -DPTRACING -DNDEBUG
-Os -g -fno-exceptions -felide-constructors -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0
-I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -g -O2 -Wall
-Wextra -Winit-self -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wstrict-aliasing=2
-Wfloat-equal -Wshadow -MT opal-call.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/opal-call.Tpo
-c -o opal-call.o `test -f 'endpoints/opal-call.cpp' || echo
'./'`endpoints/opal-call.cpp
endpoints/sip.cpp: In member function 'virtual void Opal::Sip::CallProtocolManager::OnReceivedMESSAGE(OpalTransport&, SIP_PDU&)':
endpoints/sip.cpp:809: error: 'class SIPURL' has no member named 'AdjustForRequestURI'
endpoints/sip.cpp: In member function 'virtual void Opal::Sip::CallProtocolManager::OnMessageFailed(const SIPURL&, SIP_PDU::StatusCodes)':
endpoints/sip.cpp:822: error: 'class SIPURL' has no member named 'AdjustForRequestURI'
endpoints/sip.cpp: In member function 'virtual void Opal::Sip::CallProtocolManager::OnPresenceInfoReceived(const PString&, const PString&, const PString&)':
endpoints/sip.cpp:896: error: 'class SIPURL' has no member named 'AdjustForRequestURI'
make[4]: *** [sip.o] Error 1
As shown in
http://opalvoip.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opalvoip/opal/trunk/src/sip/sippdu.cxx?r1=20328&r2=20450,
rjongbloed has changed in opal:
void SIPURL::AdjustForRequestURI()
with
void SIPURL::Sanitise(UsageContext context)
Now the sanitise depends on the context. Therefore, someone must update
ekiga to use the new function with the correct parameter.
I propose the patch attached, but please review it carefully, since I do
not know the internals of opal...
For info, here are the UsageContext enum from opal/include/sip/sippdu.h:
enum UsageContext {
ExternalURI, ///< URI used anywhere outside of protocol
RequestURI, ///< Request-URI (after the INVITE)
ToURI, ///< To header field
FromURI, ///< From header field
ContactURI, ///< Registration or Redirection Contact header field
RouteURI ///< Dialog Contact header field, or Record-Route
header field
};
--
Eugen
--- ekiga.orig/src/endpoints/sip.cpp 2008-06-06 16:06:56.000000000 +0200
+++ ekiga/src/endpoints/sip.cpp 2008-06-18 16:10:38.000000000 +0200
@@ -805,8 +805,8 @@
msgData.SetAt (SIPURL (from).AsString (), val);
SIPURL uri = from;
+ uri.Sanitise (FromURI);
std::string display_name = (const char *) uri.GetDisplayName ();
- uri.AdjustForRequestURI ();
std::string message_uri = (const char *) uri.AsString ();
std::string _message = (const char *) pdu.GetEntityBody ();
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@
SIP_PDU::StatusCodes /*reason*/)
{
SIPURL to = messageUrl;
- to.AdjustForRequestURI ();
+ to.Sanitise (ToURI);
std::string uri = (const char *) to.AsString ();
runtime.run_in_main (sigc::bind (im_failed.make_slot (), uri,
_("Could not send message")));
@@ -892,10 +892,6 @@
std::string status;
std::string presence = "presence-unknown";
- SIPURL sip_uri = SIPURL (user);
- sip_uri.AdjustForRequestURI ();
- std::string _uri = sip_uri.AsString ();
-
if (b.Find ("Closed") != P_MAX_INDEX)
presence = "presence-offline";
else
@@ -916,6 +912,10 @@
if ((j = s.Find (" - ")) != P_MAX_INDEX)
status = (const char *) note.Mid (j + 3);
+ SIPURL sip_uri = SIPURL (user);
+ sip_uri.Sanitise (ExternalURI);
+ std::string _uri = sip_uri.AsString ();
+
/**
* TODO
* Wouldn't it be convenient to emit the signal and have the presence core listen to it ?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]