Re: dogtail -devel Dogtail 0.7.0 Released
- From: Zack Cerza <zcerza redhat com>
- To: Jeffrey Huang <Jeffrey Huang Sun COM>
- Cc: install team bj <installzone-bj Sun COM>, dogtail-devel-list <dogtail-devel-list gnome org>, dogtail-list <dogtail-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: dogtail -devel Dogtail 0.7.0 Released
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:41:00 -0500
[Removing gnome-announce from CC as I don't want to be rude or spammy]
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 14:52 +0800, Jeffrey Huang wrote:
> Hi, Zack,
Hi Jeffrey,
> I am using dogtail to do GUI automated testing on OpenSolaris,
> and very happy to see it is updated with the new atspi, as my testing
> was blocking for quite something, and even think about to move to LDTP.
Yes, it took far longer than anyone wanted to get the release out; the
whole "just one more fix" attitude...
> So as moving on, can we make some improvements to let us be updated
> with status and progress, include:
>
> 1. Status update, like when incompatibility happens if GNOME and ATSPI
> changed
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Are you talking about things like
changes in Dogtail's API? Or change sin the GNOME/AT-SPI stack?
> 2. Progress of current development
> I can get some info from timeline:
> https://fedorahosted.org/dogtail/timeline
The above (or 'git log' from a clone) is currently the best way to see
what's going on with the project.
> 3. Future plan, like
> - Schedule for next major release
> - How often it is updated? Is it on a regular basis?
These two are really the same issue. I would like updates to be on a
more regular basis, absolutely.
> - Any plan to support new features or new updates in the future?
Yes, absolutely. Since the 0.7.0 release I focused on fleshing out unit
tests, because I have a backlog of patches to go through. The next
feature I plan to work on is the logging mechanism. It's a little too
old and inflexible. I'm looking at replacing it with something based on
python's own logging module.
> I would recommend that dogtail is very good harness for Gnome GUI testing,
> so what I'd to like to see is to make it more confident for test
> engineers to use it.
Glad to hear that it's working for you. I completely understand what
you're saying. I'm doing my best to improve the organization of the
project these days. As always, input is appreciated!
Cheers,
Zack
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]