dogtail-devel [Bug 377298] dogtail is not localized



If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377298

  dogtail | Framework | Ver: unspecified

Takao Fujiwara changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #99833|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




------- Comment #26 from Takao Fujiwara  2007-11-30 11:16 UTC -------
Created an attachment (id=99898)
 --> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=99898&action=view)
Revised patch from #99833

> No, auto* is fine. This is how it fails:
> + aclocal
> aclocal:configure.in:14: warning: macro `AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT' not found in
library
> + autoconf

OK, it makes sense. Actually we need AM_GLIB_GNU_GETTEXT on Solaris.
I provided the automake method to generate the Makefile not to depend on the
platform because the maitainer didn't succeed to build my patch and my first
patch didn't use automake.
Now I think you can build my patch and understand it so I reverted the method
not to use automake again. 

It's the same reason to provide the patch of .spec to understand my patch.
Actually many distributers don't use the bundled .spec file and I don't mind
you customize the build.
e.g.
# make MSGFMT=your_msgfmt
This can override the definition.
But I need to provide patch to build .mo files and i18n .desktop in dogtail.

> It tries to overwrite my system's dogtail, and it fails since i'm not root. So,
the problem is in dogtail's Makefile. I fixed it; see my next patch.

I fixed it. See my patch.

> An example:
> change the quit() function in sniff to:

I don't think this is a actual problem to fix the dogtail i18n code.
Many translators use intltool to get the latest POTFILE.in and .pot file for
GNOME applications. So I think it makes sense to provide the framework with
intltool so that translators get all untranslated strings by themselves.

> I found that pygettext.py (python's xgettext,
Is it related with the discussion of the i18n code?
Translators can select any xgettext tools but I think they should get all
untranslated strings with any xgettext tools through all applications.

Could you review the attached patch?

Thanks.


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377298.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]