dogtail-devel [Bug 345734] New: Should Dogtail use the standard PEP282 logging module rather than define its own

["dogtail (bugzilla.gnome.org)" <bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>]

Do not reply to this via email (we are currently unable to handle email
responses and they get discarded).  You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345734
 dogtail | Framework | Ver: CVS HEAD

           Summary: Should Dogtail use the standard PEP282 logging module
                    rather than define its own
           Product: dogtail
           Version: CVS HEAD
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: Framework
        AssignedTo: dogtail-maint gnome bugs
        ReportedBy: dmalcolm redhat com
         QAContact: dogtail-maint gnome bugs
     GNOME version: Unspecified
   GNOME milestone: Unspecified


Please describe the problem:
Dogtail has its own logging.py module.

A "logging" module was added as a result of PEP 282 to Python 2.3:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0282/

API docs are here:
http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/module-logging

Should we simply recommend the use of this module?  This has a 
"logging.foo()" API, rather than a "log.foo()" API.   Ideally we'd like
timestamps as well.

Steps to reproduce:



Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the QA contact for the bug.
You are watching the assignee for the bug.