Re: (apparently) undefined object, with attachment
- From: Hans Breuer <hans breuer org>
- To: dia-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: (apparently) undefined object, with attachment
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:54:33 +0100
Am 14.12.2014 um 02:14 schrieb George Georgalis:
While editing a complex diagram, I tried to ungroup three "Flowchart
Process" objects, on doing so, they disappeared. I was able to undo and
cut/paste them into the attached document; where the behaviour can be
repeated.
According to my test with your file the objects don't disappear due to
ungrouping, they just move. After ungrouping there is "Selection of 3
objects" shown in the status line. By hitting ctrl-e (Best Fit) you can
make them visible again.
For some unknown reason, the two segments connecting the objects where not
cut with the grouped objects. So I pasted them into the doc separately.
Transformed groups don't support connections, not sure if this is related.
Noteworthy, I am using head version from 2014-11-02, which includes my
patch for larger handles
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2014-November/msg00021.html
Again, I think this is not a side effect of the bigger handles.
Also noteworthy, the behaviour is reminiscent of objects that would
disappear when resizing iff my handles patch was applied cf
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2014-October/msg00000.html
Could the ungrouping function have an issue similar to prior
Group::move_hande() issue with the handles patch?
The group is transformed, but by ungrouping the transformation is dropped,
because not every object supports transformations. So I don't think there
is a bug at all.
And I wonder about your subject "undefined object". Where did I miss the
undefined object in your descriptiom or file?
-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to
get along without it. -- Dilbert
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]