Re: Remove Element width/height from properties dialog again

[Lars Clausen <lars raeder dk>]

On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 20:10 +0100, Lars Clausen wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 18:13 +0100, Hans Breuer wrote:
> > On 25.02.2006 17:59, Lars Clausen wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 10:04 +0100, Hans Breuer wrote:
> > > > As already mentioned in
> > > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328200
> > > > and
> > > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331027
> > > > I'd like to get rid of the Element width (and height)
> > > > entries in the standard properties dialogs again.
> > > > IMHO they are causing more harm than good.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > It is very useful for anyone doing modelling of things with a physical
> > > size.  I have had a use for it already.  I know of one problem only they
> > > have, namely that if you change the size of the object while the
> > > properties dialog is open, it doesn't update.  Do you see any other kind
> > > of harm in having them?
> > Yes, please follow the give bug links:
> > - the aspect ratio property is not respectzed
>
> In general, limits set by the object are not respected.  This is because
> they usually live in the move_handle functions, which are not called
> here.  That will be a little tricky to do right.  If I can't come up
> with a good solution, I will remove the setters again.

I have the good solution, namely to let objects have a check_constraints
function, but it's too big to add during release.  It will be foremost
on my plate for next iteration, so width/height gets turned off for now.

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (lars raeder dk, larsrc gmail com, http://lars.raeder.dk)
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I will defend to the
 death your right to say it."
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire