Re: Re[2]: Development; other diagram types
- From: Lars Clausen <lrclause cs uiuc edu>
- To: dia-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Re[2]: Development; other diagram types
- Date: 27 Jan 2003 14:12:02 -0600
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Alan Horkan wrote:
Indeed, this issue of linewidth zero is just a dead mashed horse. I made
the deliberate choice to explicitely never issue a linewidth zero to any
output device whatsoever; I issue a very very thin (but constant and
mastered) width instead. The rationale is in the source, changelogs and
in the ML archives; I see zero reason to change this behaviour.
While a dont have any problem with this behaviour i suspect the specifics
of the implementation it might have something to do with an unwanted side
effect i have been suffering when attempting to create shapes with just a
fill but no outline.
I think i may have mentioned this before but not explained it
particularly well.
I still don't understand this -- what is the difference between those three
figures, propertywise?
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it." | Where are we going, and
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | what's with the handbasket?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]