Re: Whatever happened to 0.89?

[Cyrille Chepelov <chepelov calixo net>]

Le ven, nov 30, 2001, à 07:56:37 -0800, Robert Campbell a écrit:
> I'm using a 0.89 binary that I got from a link in the mailing list archive (thanks, Hans).  It works great 
> and is noticeably more stable (the warning about anti-aliased mode still comes up, but I'd swear the 
> problems were less frequent or nonexistent).  So why no official release?  The Dia home page, Hans' windows 
> port page, and the Win32 installer page on SourceForge all refer to 0.88-something.
>
> Please consider this my vote for a 0.89 or (0.88-something++) release.  And a bleeding edge release, too, 
> would be like an early Christmas present; I'm psyched to try the new tree feature.

Thanks for the feedback ! 
Unfortunately, we messed (again) the release process for 0.89. I would,
personally, vote for a real 0.90, perhaps end of december (but I can't
contribute for the moment). 0.90 should not release until the transition
from xml-i18n-tools to intltools is done (there is too much mess currently
with attempting to support an old, broken version of xml-i18n-tools which is
completely obsolete nowadays).

        -- Cyrille

-- 
Grumpf.