Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules
- From: Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com>
- To: Tristan Van Berkom <tristan vanberkom codethink co uk>
- Cc: Matthias Klumpp <matthias tenstral net>, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro gnome org>, Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 12:23:27 +0100
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 06:23, Tristan Van Berkom via desktop-devel-list
<desktop-devel-list gnome org> wrote:
Proposing that we replace references to master/slave relationships with
other terminology and proposing that we eliminate the usage of both
words entirely are two entirely different proposals, this is a proposal
of the latter which appears to be masquerading as the former.
This nails my thinking completely. I've already removed all references
to master/slave in my other projects (fwupd and LVFS), but renaming
the master branch which has no connection with any kind of slave is
just a completely different proposal.
Richard.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]