Re: Signature for a released source code package
- From: Uwe Scholz <u scholz83 gmx de>
- To: Christian Hergert <christian hergert me>,desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Signature for a released source code package
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 09:39:51 +0200
Okay, in this case I will have a look in our config files and change the output of make distcheck. This
should be enough then.
Best
Uwe
Am 15. Oktober 2017 00:19:53 MESZ schrieb Christian Hergert <christian hergert me>:
On 10/14/2017 01:08 PM, Uwe Scholz wrote:
I have been asked by a user why I don't put a signature for the
software
package on my projects homepage. Actually, I just put a link to the
*.tar.xz file on it, pointing to the these file(s) on the gnome
server:
https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-commander/1.8/
I'm not up to date on the history, but I think we distribute .tar.xz
for
everything now?
If you upload a .tar.xz instead of your .tar.bz2, it will not be
modified by ftpadmin and your sha256 will continue to be correct.
-- Christian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]