Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+

The project, not everyfile. It's more like accepting that Nautilus is gpl3+ now since some files are gpl3+ already. That's what I mean by re licensing.

Carlos Soriano

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+
Local Time: May 25, 2017 12:36 PM
UTC Time: May 25, 2017 10:36 AM
From: swilmet gnome org
To: Carlos Soriano <csoriano protonmail com>
desktop-devel-list gnome org <desktop-devel-list gnome org>

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:10:56AM -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> I still get different opinions from different people on that. But that
> makes sense to me. Probably makes sense to relicense the files too at
> some point, but that would be a later decision.
> Do you know any advantage of relicensing the files themselves?

Well, I thought you wanted to license Nautilus as GPLv3+, that's the
topic of this thread…



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]