Re: developer.gnome.org and meson
- From: Michael Biebl <mbiebl gmail com>
- To: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>
- Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro gnome org>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: developer.gnome.org and meson
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:11:41 +0200
I would prefer if building from git is the same as building from a
dist tarball, which means I wouldn't ship any pre-generated files in
the tarballs unless it's absolutely necessary.
I don't consider the additional dependencies for building the docs an
issue, at least for distro builds it isn't.
I guess it can be useful to not require those dependencies during a
bootstrap phase, but simply being able to disable the documentation is
sufficient for that.
2017-08-09 16:20 GMT+02:00 Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>:
In the medium-to-long term, I'd really appreciate if
developer.gnome.org stopped trying to extract documentation from
random locations inside tarballs, munge the cross-references, and
published the HTML on a static website. This would avoid having to
generate documentation at all, except when needed. After all, Linux
distributions rebuild the documentation when building the binary
packages anyway, so shipping documentation in release tarballs is
pretty much for the benefit of developer.gnome.org to begin with.
Ideally, with the switch to Gitlab, we'd be able to run CI targets for
each module; that would allow us to build the API reference (and any
other documentation we deem worthy of publishing), ensure that the
cross-references pointed to a well-known URL prefix as part of the
build itself, and publish them when pushing a release tag.
Additionally, GitLab pages[0] would ensure that any module with
documentation would have it published, without necessarily teaching
developer.gnome.org how to do it.
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
[0]: https://about.gitlab.com/features/pages/
On 9 August 2017 at 15:12, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 08:33 -0500, mcatanzaro gnome org wrote:
Hi,
developer.gnome.org is going to have some problems because for meson
modules 'ninja dist' does not include generated gtk-doc files in the
tarball. At least one maintainer is working around this by manually
generating tarballs with gtk-doc included instead of using 'ninja
dist'. I don't recommend doing that since that's equivalent to
skipping
distcheck. It's better to use meson's dist target.
developer.gnome.org
is just going to have to learn to build docs itself.
Is anybody working on developer.gnome.org? Anyone interested in
taking
on this task? Otherwise it is going to be stuck with outdated docs.
I filed this:
https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/2166
I don't know whether that's something we'd want longer term, but it's a
win short-term.
Cheers
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
https://www.bassi.io
[@] ebassi [@gmail.com]
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]