Re: Rygel/GUPnP licensing

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:19 +0100, Jens Georg wrote:

having dug through the variants of (L)GPL license texts lately, I 
noticed that we apparenly have put Rygel and GUPnP under a weird
of LGPL v2 versions. The text and version comes from the "old"
GPL 2, but as a license name we use "Lesser GPL" in the headers but 
Library GPL in the COPYING file.

Does anyone know whether I can just do a "soft" relicensing to
LGPLv2.1+ by myself (the license says version 2 or later) to clean
up or whether I need to involve all contributing parties (oh dear)?

Pretty sure all those versions are compatible, so this shouldn't be a

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]