Re: Rygel/GUPnP licensing

[Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>]

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:19 +0100, Jens Georg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having dug through the variants of (L)GPL license texts lately, I 
> noticed that we apparenly have put Rygel and GUPnP under a weird
> mixure 
> of LGPL v2 versions. The text and version comes from the "old"
> Library 
> GPL 2, but as a license name we use "Lesser GPL" in the headers but 
> Library GPL in the COPYING file.
>
> Does anyone know whether I can just do a "soft" relicensing to
> "proper" 
> LGPLv2.1+ by myself (the license says version 2 or later) to clean
> this 
> up or whether I need to involve all contributing parties (oh dear)?

Pretty sure all those versions are compatible, so this shouldn't be a
problem.