Re: Discouraging use of sync APIs

On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 06:52:13AM -0500, Ondrej Holy wrote:
We already have g_file_read_async, it was probably typo, however
I wonder which methods doesn't have async versions? Would be probably
good start to implemented them if there are any.

I meant that currently:
  - g_file_read_async is async
  - g_file_read is sync

... instead of:
  - g_file_read being async
  - g_file_read_sync being sync.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]