Re: spring cleaning in gtk-doc for next-next verison (1.21)
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>
- To: Stefan Sauer <ensonic hora-obscura de>
- Cc: Desktop Development List <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: spring cleaning in gtk-doc for next-next verison (1.21)
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:43:25 +0000
hi;
On 30 December 2014 at 19:08, Stefan Sauer <ensonic hora-obscura de> wrote:
On 12/29/2014 01:28 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
hi;
On 29 December 2014 at 12:11, Stefan Sauer <ensonic hora-obscura de> wrote:
./gtk+-2/docs/reference/gdk/tmpl
./gtk+-2/docs/reference/gtk/tmpl
./gtk+-2/docs/reference/libgail-util/tmpl
we may port gtk2, but I'm not sure about bumping the dependency on a
"frozen" branch…
The gtk-doc dependency? 1.11 is good enough, the tmpl free build was
added in 1.8 (Feb 16 2007).
I'll have a go at fixing gtk2, then.
./gconf/doc/gconf/tmpl
./gtkhtml/doc/tmpl
aren't these two deprecated? we don't ship anything with gconf any
more for sure…
./seed/doc/reference/tmpl
what's the status of seed? isn't it unmaintained?
ciao,
Emmanuele.
Thanks for checking. At some point those modules will need to use an old
version of gtk-doc to build their docs. In jhbuild we could use
--disable-gtkdoc if we still need to build them.
we don't usually build with gtk-doc in jhbuild — at least, I don't
know of anybody that adds '--enable-gtk-doc' to the autogenargs.
ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
http://www.bassi.io
[ ] ebassi [ gmail com]
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]