Re: _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW buggy timestamp
- From: Mike Qin <mikeandmore gmail com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW buggy timestamp
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:39:27 -0400
I remember if you have not installed ibus-gtk, ibus will fallback to XIM
engine. Also check your current input method, whether XIM was triggered
or not.
As far as I know in Ubuntu, you don't have to install anything extra for
XIM, XIM comes by default, and XIM will be the default fallback option
if gtk-immodule is not available for ibus.
XIM is indeed a very old protocol, other distros will separate
gtk3-immodules-xim as an optional package, but it seems that Ubuntu don't.
http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/amd64/libgtk-3-0/filelist
Thanks
Mike
On 10/28/2013 10:42 AM, Lanoxx wrote:
Hi,
I am on Ubuntu but I use metacity + gnome-panel. I think ibus is the
current IME method, i cannot find any info that XIM is installed. I
think it would be very helpful if there existed a method to identify the
buggy client which is causing these errors, otherwise its very hard to
know where to search for the problem?
In this case, it's likely that all of xclients have a textbox will be
reported as bogus. It's a libX11 bug.
Regards
Sebastian
On 28/10/13 13:23, Mike Qin wrote:
Are you using some XIM input method? There is a bug fixed recently in
libX11.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39367
XIM module of libX11 in previous version will for sure send bogus
timestamp.
Thanks
Mike
On 28/10/13 06:56 AM, Lanoxx wrote:
Hi,
when I manually start mutter or metacity in the terminal with the
--replace option, then I always see errors like this:
last_user_time (39093728) is greater than comparison timestamp
(16350305). This most likely represents a buggy client sending
inaccurate timestamps in messages such as _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW. Trying to
work around...
Is there any way to find out which application is causing this problem?
Or is it somehow possible to let mutter, metacity print the name of the
program that is responsible for this?
Otherwise, how can we fix this?
Cheers
Lanoxx
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]