Re: git submodules vs translators
- From: Will Thompson <will thompson collabora co uk>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: git submodules vs translators
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:24:03 +0100
On 28/06/13 01:01, Colin Walters wrote:
Any other thoughts?
Last time I accidentally reverted a submodule update, I took a look at
the recently-added 'git subtree' as a possible replacement. I haven't
actually tried it in practice, and perhaps it would just replace one set
of confusing gotchas with another, but I'm pretty sure it resolves this
problem of having to remember to run 'git submodule update' after every
pull.
(Not to be confused with the subtree merge strategy: see
http://blogs.atlassian.com/2013/05/alternatives-to-git-submodule-git-subtree/
for an introduction.)
Irrespective of technology, ideally one wouldn't have to care about
embedded libraries unless one is actually working on code that actually
uses them, whereas right now everyone has to care or risk breaking the
build.
--
Will
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]