Re: About clutter-gtk and his lack of accessibility support

["Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak gnome org>]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Matthias Clasen
<matthias clasen gmail com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:11 PM, PiÃeiro <apinheiro igalia com> wrote:
>
> Here is what I am seeing on my system right now:
>
> [mclasen golem ~]$ rpm -q --whatrequires "libclutter-gtk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)"
> libchamplain-gtk-0.12.3-5.fc19.x86_64
> cheese-libs-3.7.4-2.fc19.x86_64
> totem-3.6.3-3.fc19.x86_64
> cheese-3.7.4-2.fc19.x86_64
> gnome-photos-3.7.3-4.fc19.x86_64
> gnome-initial-setup-0.6-2.fc19.x86_64
> eog-plugins-3.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64
> gnome-games-gnibbles-3.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64
> gnome-games-quadrapassel-3.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64
> gnome-games-swell-foop-3.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64
> gnome-games-lightsoff-3.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64
> empathy-3.7.5-2.fc19.x86_64
> gnome-color-manager-3.7.5-1.fc19.x86_64
> gnome-boxes-3.7.5-1.fc19.x86_64
> control-center-3.7.5.1-1.fc19.x86_64
> sushi-3.7.5-1.fc19.x86_64
> gnome-documents-3.7.5-1.fc19.x86_64
>
> A few of these will probably follow the gnome-documents example and
> shed the clutter-gtk dependency in time for 3.8, and for some others,
> having the (small) clutter parts inaccessible may not be a big deal
> (e.g. the photo dialog in the user panel). It might help your decision
> to evaluate a few of these apps to see how much their accessibility is
> affected by clutter-gtk use - it might turn out that everything except
> for documents, boxes and photos is fine... and if those 3 move to pure
> gtk in time for 3.8, all is good.

We're making extensive use of clutter-gtk in Boxes so moving away from
it in time for 3.8 does not sound realistic.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124