I emailed the company regarding the availability of the source. They
don't have the link on the website, but the code is available. (from rich loomio org)
I imagine it would be useful for deciding on designs/various issues that come up. I don't know if it would be more useful to have a single group for all of GNOME, or one for each GNOME project that's interested. Sriram, while I agree many problems would be alleviated with more volunteer time, I've witnessed multiple instances in the past 6 months where decisions were not made democratically, despite a clear lack of consensus. Most recently, there were a great deal of changes to the gnome-shell "All Applications" view very late in the 3.8 schedule, well after code freeze, and despite visible disagreement. Loomio seems to offer an intuitive way of seeing how controversial a change is. And certainly, GNOME has gotten a lot of flack from the larger Free Software community for controversial changes. Loomio also seems like it would be a more accessible way for more people to get involved and provide feedback on potential decisions. Free Software means freedom, and having a more open and democratic decision-making process would do much to make this freedom more tangible for more people. On 04/14/2013 08:18 PM, Sriram
Ramkrishna wrote:
|