Re: IM Integration: Let's demonstrate our languages in the Wiki

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Ma Xiaojun <damage3025 gmail com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Aron Xu <aronxu gnome org> wrote:
>> What do you mean by "separate implementation"?
> "those IMF developers spend so many time to implement XKB support
> (ibus-xkb, fcitx-keyboard)?"
>> This question does not make sense because engines are not maintained
>> by IMF, their status cannot be improved by IMF either.
> AFAIK, @csslayer commits most new (after Yuking's origin fcitx paused
> development) code in fcitx project.
> Definitely, he should be maintaining engines and IMF at the same time.
> For IBus, I think its github page shows who maintains which component clearly.

They are not engines, but wrappers, the glue of the engine and IMF.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]