On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 10:22 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:59 -0600, Ted Gould wrote: > > I think that this would be more apparent if the DBus interface > > descriptions were maintained outside of the systemd codebase. > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/timedated > > I won't comment on if you accept this as being sufficiently divorced > from systemd or not... From the wiki page: systemd 30 and newer include systemd-timedated I would conclude that any dependency on that interface is a dependency on systemd version 30 or newer. Therefore, GNOME has that as a dependency in 3.4 on systemd > 30. To be clear, I don't think that's a problem in how the page is written, I think that's a reality of where the interface is defined. --Ted
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part