=?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_Using_the_Unicode_ellipsis_=28=85=29_instead_of_thre?= =?windows-1252?Q?e_periods?=
- From: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Using the Unicode ellipsis (…) instead of three periods
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:51:17 -0500
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org> wrote:
>
> Is this really the right thing to do. Even the Microsoft page
> uses the rather wishy-washy "Consider using the ratio symbol",
> as if they're not quite sure this is a good idea. It does look
> nicer, but it's semantically wrong. A time is not a ratio. How
> does Orca read it?
I don't really have an answer to the philosophical question of what a
'ratio' really is and whether
9-colon-49 is any more correct than 9-ratio-49 when it comes to
representing time.
But I can say that Orca reads the one like the other: "nine fortynine".
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]