Re: Consolidating Core Desktop libraries

On 11/09/10 16:33, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> Then there are microlibraries, killing which would help performance.
> These include for example libgtop, libgweather and libgnomekbd, but also
> liboobs if the system tool backends are not dead.
> I can't find an use for them outside core desktop, while on the other
> hand there are already core desktop packages that depend on them.

I'd say no.  If it's already in a library that does not break its API every
other week, let it be there.  That's the correct design anyway.  Something
like libgweather does not belong in a generic "desktop" library.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]