Re: Versioned symbols for 3.0?

[Nicolas Trangez <ikke nicolast be>]

On 18/05/10 17:33, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > The ultimate goal is being able to automatically detect at link time
> > that program A requires library B implementing at least version X of
> > the interface and embedding such information in packages
> > automatically. Just like we do for glibc with its GLIBC_x_y
> > interfaces.
> >
> > The changes required for glibc was:
> > 1) removing the -export-symbols-regex "^g.*" passed to libtool
> > 2) adding -Wl,-version-script=libglib-2.0.ver to libglib_2_0_la_LDFLAGS
> > 3) creating the .ver file
> >
> > A sample file (marking just one symbol as GLIB_2_24 for demonstration
> > purposes) looks like that:
>
> Are you talking about glibc or glib? It's a bit confusing to me...

Looks like glib to me, not much glibc around ;-)

Nicolas