Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

["Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>]

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Frederic Peters <fpeters gnome org> wrote:
> Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>
>> > Heh, the logic should be reversed :-) It can't be approved (or likely to
>> > be approved) until the app is translatable.
>>
>>   Since me and Bastien (based on Lennart's arguments on this thread)
>> agreed to kill the preferences UI in favor of some simple options to
>> be added to gnome-user-share dialog, do I still need to do this for my
>> proposal to be considered?
>
> In another branch of this thread, Vincent Untz gave you an answer:
>
> | >    Yeah something like that. However most of the errors/warnings are
> | > sent over to the (remote) client as well and it all depends on the
> | > client whether it shows them to user or not.
> |
> | In this case, it probably makes sense to have them translated, to be
> | on the safe side.
>
> And that makes me think the preferences UI was not all there was to
> Rygel, other parts should be translatable as well.

   I didn't miss that. :) If you read carefully he said "just to be
safe" and hence it's not so important. Still, I tried to setup the
translation framework, got into some weird autofoo issues, asked some
gnome developers (including you) to help me out on IRC and when nobody
replied, I gave-up and started working on something more useful: unit
tests.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124

P.S. In case you are interested, here is my attempt:
http://gitorious.org/rygel/rygel/commits/l10n