Re: Module Proposal: Rygel
- From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>
- To: Frederic Peters <fpeters gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Module Proposal: Rygel
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:39:07 +0200
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Frederic Peters <fpeters gnome org> wrote:
> Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> > Heh, the logic should be reversed :-) It can't be approved (or likely to
>> > be approved) until the app is translatable.
>> Since me and Bastien (based on Lennart's arguments on this thread)
>> agreed to kill the preferences UI in favor of some simple options to
>> be added to gnome-user-share dialog, do I still need to do this for my
>> proposal to be considered?
> In another branch of this thread, Vincent Untz gave you an answer:
> | > Yeah something like that. However most of the errors/warnings are
> | > sent over to the (remote) client as well and it all depends on the
> | > client whether it shows them to user or not.
> | In this case, it probably makes sense to have them translated, to be
> | on the safe side.
> And that makes me think the preferences UI was not all there was to
> Rygel, other parts should be translatable as well.
I didn't miss that. :) If you read carefully he said "just to be
safe" and hence it's not so important. Still, I tried to setup the
translation framework, got into some weird autofoo issues, asked some
gnome developers (including you) to help me out on IRC and when nobody
replied, I gave-up and started working on something more useful: unit
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
P.S. In case you are interested, here is my attempt:
] [Thread Prev