Well, I am really sorry for using HTML. I thought it would be liked. Well, there is no data indicating that Ubuntu Brainstorm works better than filing enhancement bugs, for that takes the elaboration of an investigation I am not prepared to launch. As far as I know, there is no user-accessible numeric record with the information you request in your second question. Most of the implemented ideas have very good solution ratings, yes. However, it is always subject to the developer's time and their will of implementing the idea. - Best regards, Wolter Hellmund On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 11:37 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Wolter Hellmund <wolterh6 gmail com> wrote: > > The project is intended to use a Brainstorm System, which is already provided by > > IdeaTorrent. It is already implemented in successful projects such as Ubuntu > > Brainstorm, SourceForge.net and others. > > Is there any data indicating that Ubuntu Brainstorm works better than > filing enhancement bugs? Are there any statistics about how many > Ubuntu Brainstorm ideas are actually implemented, and how many are > implemented largely due to feedback from Brainstorm? > > I would hate to implement a system like this that gave users a false > impression of being able to vote features into GNOME, so I think hard > data showing that's not what would happen is important. > > Sandy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part