Re: Module proposal: dconf

[Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>]

On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 13:22 +0200, Javier Jardón wrote:
> 2009/10/13 Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>:
> >
> > Ryan is a bit sad to not get feedback on his proposal, so a bit more
> > seriously: I think what we probably need is a migration plan. Should we
> > move all the code from gconf to dconf in one cycle (if possible)? Should
> > apps implement migration for the data in gconf? etc.
> >
> > Ryan, you might also want to detail out the benefits over gconf.
> >
> > Also, devhelp has a branch for a port to dconf, iirc. So that might be
> > something that people might want to look at to get some idea of what
> > this involved.
> 
> I've already created a page to track the progress and as a central
> place to get info and examples about the migration to dconf/gsettings
> [1]
> 
> So,  we can start the work if this is finally accepted ;)

This is nice, but only one app has been ported. Could a few apps be
ported before people make a decision? Porting something like Evolution
would be a nice fire test for Dconf...