Richard Hughes wrote: > Anyway, if anyone has any great argument about why I shouldn't propose > gnome-packagekit for 2-29 (or why I should do it for 2-27) please > shout now. I'm also not sure whether to propose it for the desktop set > or something else. Ideas welcome. I was going to ask about the debconf support in PackageKit, but I just found [1] which seems to suggest it's being fixed. Is that right? Will any Debian policy compliant package work fine with PackageKit? I guess the solution is not KDE/Qt specific. If so that's good news. Cheers, Emilio [1] http://dantti.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/packagekit-and-the-road-to-debian/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature