Re: Zeitgeist status update

Are you looking into some situation integration, like integrating information
from Hamster. A course example of that would be that you use different
application, documents in work that at home. A more fine grate example
would be if you are working on art, surfing, finance you would get
programs that you use in that situations.

That could be integrated into NetworkManager where it would try to see
patterns based on situational information, from Hamster or other
application that log these kinds of things. VPN, Proxy, preferred Internet
connections are a couple of examples of that. NM could ask the Zeitgeist
demon what configurations to use.

Then you could search "The document I was working on at work around
10 am"

Olafur Arason

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
<mikkel kamstrup gmail com> wrote:
> Hi,
> With the 2.30 module deadline passed it seems appropriate that we give
> a status report from the Zeitgeist team.
> Since there have been a good deal of confusion about what Zeitgeist
> is, and isn't, about I will try clear this up in this mail as well. I
> will try to stay low on the buzz word factor and leave some of the
> more exotic use cases out to avoid too much speculation.
>    * Zeitgeist in 1 sentence
> Zeitgeist is an event logging framework used to keep a log of user
> activity in a structured way.
>    * What new services do we provide for UIs and applications
> Zeitgeist provides a DBus API to query and update the activity log.
> Clients can query on time ranges, the acting applications, mimetypes,
> and Nepomuk classifications of the subjects and events. Sorting can be
> done on various criteria such as usage frequency and recent usage.
> Concrete examples could be "Get me most used files of mimetypes x,y or
> z between the months January till March"
> One can also query for documents that are used in context with others.
> As in "Which documents/websites are used with
> within the last week".
> It is also possible for the applications to get notified when the log
> is updated. This is for instance used by the Parental Control
> application as well as the GNOME Activity Journal.
>    * What Problems can we solve
> The straight forward use case is as a GtkRecentManager on drugs.
> Zeitgeist removes the need for each application to parse a big XML
> file to retrieve recently used documents. It also removes the need to
> ever truncate your usage history, our database format is compact and
> can easily contain years of history. My estimation is that 1M log
> entries will take up about 80mb (give or take 20mb).
> Open up for a range of query capabilities that GtkRecentManager
> doesn't provide. Instead of simply storing the most recent usage event
> on a resource we store all usage events. This way we can not only
> answer when the most recent use case was, but also account for the
> entire usage history.
> One use case that is already in the works is having the most used
> resources within the last 3 weeks for an app in the context menu in a
> window list. This is for example done in Docky.
> Looking past just logging resource usage we will also start monitoring
> window and document focus times. This opens up to a whole new world of
> contextual relevancy that I wont elaborate on here. I am trying to
> stick to the more down to earth aspects of Zeitgeist.
>    * Which processes/daemons do we run
> Zeitgeist itself is a single DBus daemon. Where the picture gets a
> little more fuzzy is how we collect events. The long term goal is for
> apps to submit events, maybe hooking directly into GtkRecentManager,
> or in any case provide a very convenient way for apps to do this. Apps
> like Pidgin or Empathy would probably need some plugin for logging
> usage statistics of your contacts.
> Right now we resort to less elegant ways of collecting events, like
> running a separate daemon harvesting Firefox's history,
> GtkRecentlyUsed's and other applications' history (this daemon is also
> known as the datahub). The datahub is already on its way to becoming
> redundant now that a Firefox extension is in the works (and one for
> Epiphany already exist). It is our intent that the datahub should
> eventually go away as application support becomes widespread, but it
> may eventually still prove useful for usage together with online
> service.
>    * How resource hungry are we
> Normal memory usage is around 5-10mb for the core Zeitgeist daemon.
> The datahub process (and I repeat; we want to get rid of this) is
> about 12mb.
>    * What dependencies
> Right now the daemon depends on SQLite, Python 2.5, python-gobject,
> python-xdg, and python-dbus. For the datahub we additionally need
> python-gconf and python-gtk2, but the datahub is optional.
>    * Future plans
> We have spend a lot of time planning and designing lately. When we
> have a stable reference implementation of our design in Python we plan
> to use that as a template for a C implementation. To be clear - the C
> version will be log-format and API compatible with the Python version.
> We plan to make good use of the upcoming Zeitgeist hackfest and should
> have a 0.3 development release ready shortly after. If we are happy
> about the 0.3 series we will rename it to 0.9 and go for a 1.0.
> Regarding Gnome 3.0 I think we are in a situation much like Owen
> Taylor recently outlined for Gnome Shell on the release-team mailing
> list[1]. If we are desperate for Zeitgeist to be included in a Gnome
> 3.0 this March I believe it would be doable. It will require that we
> really bust our backs and cut some corners, but it's doable.
> Personally (not speaking for the Zeitgeist team here) I am not sure it
> would be a very good idea for the same reasons Owen mention.
>    * Relation to Tracker and Other Semantic Technologies
> The very short version of this is that Tracker and Zeitgeist does not
> depend on each other in any way. The catch however is that either one
> becomes a whole lot more powerful when working together. To take an
> example consider tagging. Zeitgeist is just a log so we don't manage
> your tags, we are however fully equipped to understand events
> concerning your tags. So you manage the tags via Tracker and track
> their usage in Zeitgeist. The combined power enables one to reason
> about what tags relate to resources in a temporal manner, even with
> resources that are not tagged.
> In the Zeitgeist world we call an application like Tracker a
> Repository. Nepomuk or Desktop-CouchDB might work as other
> Repositories. If there is some confusion in this area it is
> understandable, since we do have some Repository-like features in our
> 0.2 series. This is however removed from the 0.3 series. It is still
> undecided if we want to define a minimal Repostiory DBus API for
> Zeitgeist and then ship a reference impl. of this API (which would run
> in a separate process). Any full fledged Repository would be able own
> the Repository service on the bus and Zeitgeist would not run its own.
> But again let me stress that a Repository is not needed for the
> Zeitgeist Log daemon to be useful.
> Cheers,
> Mikkel
> [1]: See the "Time considerations" section on
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]