[PATCH gnome-terminal] commit 3229 did actually break things
- From: Simon Hengel <simon hengel wiktory org>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: [PATCH gnome-terminal] commit 3229 did actually break things
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:14:12 +0200
Hello,
I guess commit 3229 breaks things. gconf_ping_daemon() gives 0, even if
dbus is running. This means, that if there is no gconfd-2 instance
around, gnome-terminal want start. If, with my system setup, I just
reverse 3229, everything is fine (== a gconfd-2 is started if not
already running)
Patch attached. Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Simon Hengel
Index: src/terminal.c
===================================================================
--- src/terminal.c (revision 3436)
+++ src/terminal.c (working copy)
@@ -234,9 +234,6 @@
return g_string_free (name, FALSE);
}
-/* Evil hack alert: this is exported from libgconf-2 but not in a public header */
-extern gboolean gconf_ping_daemon (void);
-
int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
@@ -444,16 +441,6 @@
g_free (argv_copy);
g_free (factory_name);
- /* If the gconf daemon isn't available (e.g. because there's no dbus
- * session bus running), we'd crash later on. Tell the user about it
- * now, and exit. See bug #561663.
- */
- if (!gconf_ping_daemon ())
- {
- g_printerr ("Failed to contact the GConf daemon; exiting.\n");
- exit (1);
- }
-
gtk_window_set_default_icon_name (GNOME_TERMINAL_ICON_NAME);
gtk_about_dialog_set_url_hook (about_url_hook, NULL, NULL);
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]