Re: Language code to language name mapping
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- Cc: Tobias Quathamer <toddy debian org>, Christian Perrier <bubulle debian org>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry debian org>
- Subject: Re: Language code to language name mapping
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:41:03 +0000
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 16:52 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Le mercredi 26 novembre 2008, à 16:27 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
> >> My question right now is, how do applications (intlclock, etc...) do that
> >> currently? And how do people think it should be done.
> >
> > intlclock doesn't use iso-codes :-)
> > Looking at totem: it parses the iso-codes xml. See
> > totem_lang_table_init() in src/totem-menu.c. In the end, it all ends in
> > hash tables.
> >
> > Abusing gettext could be nice, but the totem code is quite easy too.
>
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> Having to parse XML sucks. It's not a lot of code, but doesn't have to be
> that hard. A new library for it is definitely overkill. That's why I like
> the gettext abuse.
How often do you actually need to do it? What's actually used for right
now?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]