Re: Low memory hacks
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Simos Xenitellis <simos lists googlemail com>
- Cc: Danilo Segan <danilo gnome org>, "Nikolay V. Shmyrev" <nshmyrev yandex ru>, Brian Nitz <Brian Nitz sun com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Low memory hacks
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:31:10 +0000
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:56 +0000, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 14:02 +0000, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> > > That is a saving of at least 3M in memory.
> > >
> > > The stripping of "unneeded" messages is good, and should happen at the
> > > package generation level (not in GNOME, or when creating tarballs).
> >
> > You talk about memory savings, but do calculations based on file sizes.
> > That's doesn't work.
>
> Aren't mo files mapped to memory?
Yes, they're mapped. That doesn't result in actual memory usage. The
kernel will make sure they're only read into memory as needed.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]