Re: Removing libgnomeprint* from the desktop set

2008/6/29 Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>:
Am Freitag, den 28.03.2008, 17:12 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz:
> I'd like us to finally stop shipping libgnomeprint/libgnomeprintui as
> part of the desktop set. As far as I can tell from the jhbuild
> moduleset, it's only used by:
>  + anjuta, with the scintilla editor plugin (but there's the
>    gtksourceview editor plugin)

Why on earth there are two editor plugins shipped in the standard anjuta distribution? Wouldn't be easier to just split the scintilla editor and ship it as an external plugin?

>  + gnome-python-desktop, for bindings
>  + gnome-sharp, for bindings
>  + gtksourceview 1.x, which I'd like to kill :-) see previous mail for
>    this.

Except for Tomboy this is all still valid, and I'm afraid that GNOME
once again doesn't get it done for 2.24. Yeah, that's the lovely
decadence to not care about cleaning up the platform.

Same for where some maintainers
successfully ignore any emails or pings asking for patch reviews for
weeks now.

A lot of the remaining modules are pending for python bindings which already landed in pygobject trunk, whowever the wiki still has this as ToDo, any reason for this?

Are maintainers of modules like sabayon, gnome-python-desktop or alacarte that this code is already there? My gut feeling is that the fact that the wiki is not up to date is misleading some of them. But I might be wrong.

I would like to make a call for update of that wiki page.

At least looks good, only gtk
and atk left. Patches available.

 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed  |

desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org

Un saludo,
Alberto Ruiz

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]