Re: Proposal: enable accessibility by default for GNOME
- From: Willie Walker <William Walker Sun COM>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal: enable accessibility by default for GNOME
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:43:53 -0400
Yowsa! Li jumped on this one *fast* - there's already a fix and a
release in place. Way to go, Li!
This just makes me want to repeat the request to increase the
communication regarding issues you have regarding the accessibility
infrastructure.
For example, one of the recurring comments is "it slows my desktop down,
so I turn it off." If people can come up with specific test cases
(e.g., "bring up window x of application y with and without a11y enabled
-- notice the amount of time it takes it to appear"), it will really
help focus the investigation.
We'll get there, :-)
Will
Willie Walker wrote:
PS - Bug/RFE logged here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545849.
If there are other specific problems that people know about, I really
encourage them to log bugs. Otherwise, the team will likely not know
about them and they will likely go unfixed. The current AT-SPI
maintainer, Li Yuan, is *very* good and is remarkable in his abilities
to diagnose and resolve problems.
Will
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 17:56 -0400, Willie Walker wrote:
Wow - that polling really does bite. :-( Looks like it's been in there
for 6 years!
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/at-spi/trunk/registryd/deviceeventcontroller.c?revision=326&view=markup
To me, it kind of seems rather inefficient for the prototypical use case
of mouse motion events, which is to drive the region of interest for the
magnifier. I logged a bug/rfe a while ago and to just have gnome-mag
track the mouse directly rather than require two CORBA actions per mouse
movement (one from the bridge to Orca and one from Orca to the
magnifier): http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522967. I haven't
had time to create a patch, and the current maintainer is only doing so
very sporadically due to time constraints.
Regardless of making modifications such as those requested in bug
#522967, I wonder if we can make modifications to the bridge to only do
the polling if someone has requested to be notified of the events?
Will
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Luis Villa <luis tieguy org> wrote:
I'd love to see hard performance numbers before we reach that
conclusion. (I really don't care about memory numbers. Geeks look at
top; my fiancee just sits and taps her fingers waiting for GNOME to
log in.)
Here is one datapoint:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227476
a11y causes frequent wakeups which eat power.
Matthias
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]