On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 08:57 +0000, Ross Burton wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 22:37 +0000, Philip Withnall wrote: > > My poor knowledge of e-d-s' architecture is showing here; I believed it > > stored everything, including e-mail, but apparently it only stores the > > address book, calendar and tasks. However, my point still applies in > > that e-d-s deals with too much, and so is wasteful if you're only using > > the address book. Even so, something's still wrong, as applications > > which use e-d-s for the address book still seem to be storing wrapper > > data themselves. Maybe that's just Pidgin being not-properly-integrated, > > though. > > The DBus port of EDS, which I still need to find the time to integrate, > split the calendar and addressbook parts into separate binaries. If you > never use the addressbook code, the daemon isn't even loaded into > memory. > > The N800 et al use the DBus port of EDS, and don't even ship the > calendar parts. That's good to hear, and is pretty much exactly what I was wanting. Now Evolution itself just needs splitting. :-D Philip > Ross
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part