Re: build systems
- From: "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>
- To: Braden McDaniel <braden endoframe com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: build systems
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 12:41:07 +0000
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 22:43 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 12:27 +0100, daniel g. siegel wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > please understand, i dont want to bring up a "autotools is bad and it
> > should die"-thread, i just want to use my time to code and not to use
> > that time and effort on a build system.
>
> It is a fact of life in software development that build systems for
> nontrivial projects are themselves nontrivial. Regardless of what build
> system is in use, it is simply unrealistic to expect that you should be
> insulated from it.
>
> An extremely powerful feature that you get for free with automake is
> "make distcheck". The distcheck target builds a distribution, compiles
> it, runs tests ("make check"), installs it to a staging area, runs tests
> on the installed programs/libraries/whatever ("make installcheck"), and,
> if all that succeeded, declares your distribution Ready.
I coded distcheck into WAF a couple of months ago. It wasn't even a
difficult task...
Cheers,
--
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<gjc inescporto pt> <gustavo users sourceforge net>
"The universe is always one step beyond logic" -- Frank Herbert
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]