Re: GNOME 2.20 Python version
- From: "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>
- To: Loïc Minier <lool+gnome via ecp fr>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.20 Python version
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:38:42 +0000
On Ter, 2007-03-13 at 16:57 +0100, Lo�Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > Unlike GNOME and Linux, Python does not use odd version numbers for
> > development versions. Thus 2.5 is the latest production version of
> > Python, rather than the latest development version.
>
> I know 2.5 is a stable release; my point is that this needlessly raises
> the bar to build GNOME: anyone is free to build GNOME with whatever
> version of libc6, gcc, or python that one wants to catch some bugs (in
> GNOME or in these projects), but imposing the python version to be so
> high by default seems a gratuitous change. 3 out of 5 Ubuntu releases
> do not have Python 2.5 by default, no Debian release has it and the
> next one wont have it.
I am not proposing that GNOME modules using Python should require a
minimum Python version of 2.5. I am only proposing that "jhbuild
bootstrap" install the python 2.5 tarball instead of python 2.4. The
effect of this change is:
1. We start putting more emphasis on testing GNOME-over-python2.5
rather than GNOME-over-python2.4 (the latter has already been
extensively tested over the years, while the former hasn't);
2. We require that GNOME modules using Python make an effort to work
on Python 2.5, in addition to Python 2.4.
I think primarily it's a matter of which version of python we prefer
to test. I say we test GNOME with python 2.5 because it's the new
stable version of python and python 2.4 is not maintained any more.
--
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<gjc inescporto pt> <gustavo users sourceforge net>
The universe is always one step beyond logic
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]