Re: su/sudo wrapper

Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 23:57 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Le jeudi 31 mai 2007,  13:07 +0200, Benot Dejean a crit :
> That's the point: they're good enough to work in most cases, but the
> last time this topic was discussed, the consensus was that they were not
> good enough to be blessed or accepted for integration in GNOME.

So is there a room between blessed external dependencies and no external
dependencies ?
Benoît Dejean

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]