Re: pulseaudio vs gnome
- From: Davyd Madeley <davyd madeley id au>
- To: Damon Chaplin <damon karuna eclipse co uk>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: pulseaudio vs gnome
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:48:17 +0900
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 23:36 +0000, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 11:36 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Hey, I just wondered what the current state of affairs is in the
> > esound -> pulseaudio transition. I found a wiki page
> > (http://live.gnome.org/PulseAudio?highlight=%28pulse%29),
> > but I'm not sure how uptodate it is.
> >
> > Is this something that we can still complete for 2.18 ?
> > Is anybody working on this ?
>
> Before it goes in I'd like to see a clear roadmap for audio in GNOME,
> with support for things from simple beeps up to pro-audio apps.
>
> I guess this means gstreamer, PulseAudio and JACK. Is that the plan?
Lennart, who develops PulseAudio, recently spoke about it at
linux.conf.au:
http://mirror.linux.org.au/pub/linux.conf.au/2007/video/talks/211.ogg
(disclaimer, I don't know what the video quality is like)
He speaks about what PulseAudio can do, why you'd chose it over
technology X and how it might integrate with specific problem domain
technologies, such as Jack. Might clear some things up.
--d
--
Davyd Madeley
http://www.davyd.id.au/
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]