Re: Module decisions for GNOME 2.18
- From: Djihed Afifi <djihedlists googlemail com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: Gnome i18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Module decisions for GNOME 2.18
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:06:49 +0000
Vincent,
Thanks for this much awaited email. I took the liberty of forwarding to
gnome-i18n as we're eagerly waiting for these decisions ;)
Cheers,
Djihed
في ح، 21-01-2007 عند 15:57 +0100 ، كتب Vincent Untz:
> Hi everybody,
>
> The release team had a meeting this week. Among other things, we
> talked about the proposed modules for GNOME 2.18. Here are the decisions
> that, in our opinion, reflect the consensus in the community.
>
> We would like to thank everybody who was involved in the discussion, and
> also the authors/maintainers of the proposed modules.
>
>
> Short summary
> =============
>
> Retracted:
> GnomeScan
> tracker
> monodevelop
>
> In:
> devtools suite
> seahorse
> nm-applet
> devhelp
> glade3
>
> Out:
> gnome-main-menu
> anjuta
>
> Details for In & Out
> ====================
>
> + devtools suite
> - general consensus within the community that we want this.
> - we can build it with small steps, so no need to wait for a complete
> solution to launch it.
> - the release team hopes having the suite now will also help getting
> more traction for work on the other tools that could be included in
> the future.
>
> + seahorse
> - positive feedback from the community.
> - maintainers really did a fantastic job to integrate GNOME (adding
> requested features, getting usability reviews, and more generally
> interacting with the community).
> - since seahorse and gnome-keyring-manager are sharing use cases, it
> seems a good goal for GNOME 2.20 to integrate all missing features
> in seahorse and deprecate gnome-keyring-manager (since seahorse is
> more actively developed and maintained). This needs discussion with
> developers from both modules, though.
> - maintainers really did a fantastic job to integrate GNOME. We wanted
> to mention it twice :-)
>
> + nm-applet
> - positive feedback from the community.
> - we don't introduce an external dependency on NetworkManager, but we
> will need to mention that nm-applet needs NetworkManager (and
> probably a specific version of its API) to be useful.
> - from a release engineering point of view, things would be really
> easier to manage if NetworkManager and nm-applet were splitted.
> Maintainers are encouraged to do so before 2.18.
> - the release team also encourages people to work towards integrating
> the NetworkManager API in an easy-to-use way in our stack.
>
> + devhelp
> - positive feedback from the community.
>
> + glade3
> - not a lot of feedback, and the feedback was mixed.
> - having an interface builder in our devtools suite would be most
> useful, and it appeared from the discussions that glade3 is the best
> option there.
> - the release team thinks it's really important that an interface
> builder included in GNOME deals with the current glade files and
> with the future GtkBuilder format, and the work from the glade3
> maintainers on GtkBuilder encourage us to believe that accepting it
> is a safe choice.
>
> + gnome-main-menu
> - lots of feedback, including strongly positive and strongly negative, with
> the majority currently being negative.
> - no consensus on how this module should be included (should it replace
> the current menu? Should it only be an option?), while this question
> plays a central role when considering inclusion of this module.
> - main reason for rejecting gnome-main-menu is the lack of integration
> of its development with the community: it is not integrated with our
> main developer build tool (jhbuild), there are no release on GNOME
> FTP and thus there were no releases done during this cycle, more
> communication should have happened with usability people and
> maintainers of other relevant modules.
> - for the future, if gnome-main-menu is proposed again, it's quite
> important to discuss what we want to do with the menus (what should
> be the default? Do we need more than one menu layout? etc.). This is
> more than about inclusion of a module like gnome-main-menu, it's
> about one part of the desktop core.
>
> + anjuta
> - the current 2.x version is in development and can't go in.
> - the 1.2.x version is not maintained. We can't accept a non
> maintained version in a suite.
>
>
> Vincent
>
> --
> Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
> --
> devel-announce-list mailing list
> devel-announce-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce-list
--
Have a project you would like to be translated to Arabic?
Let us know:
http://wiki.arabeyes.org/Translation_requests
Blog: http://djihed.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]