Re: About SSL "Trick or Treat" Dialogs
- From: Pat Suwalski <pat suwalski net>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, stef memberwebs com, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Subject: Re: About SSL "Trick or Treat" Dialogs
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:45:31 -0500
Owen Taylor wrote:
If you are connecting on an insecure network (say coffee shop wireless)
then a https connection to an untrusted certificate is a distinctly weak
form of security.
It tells you that you have a encrypted connection to *somebody*.
That is correct, of course. It is, however, more secure than an open
connection. Case in point, on my mail server, which I know I connected
to properly on my wired network, and which I told Thunderbird to
remember, is not signed by a trusted authority and looks different by
host name on an outside network.
When I connect to it from outside, my password is still not traveling
through the net in plain text.
Whether by broken design or broken economics, there will always be a lot
of certificates that cannot be authenticated against a CA.
Yes, the security is weakened, but there still needs to be something
informing the user that their data isn't flying through the air in clear
text.
--Pat
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]