Re: [pygtk] Python 3.0 plans

[Johan Dahlin <johan gnome org>]

John Ehresman wrote:
> Just keep in mind that a production ready python 3.0 is a long time 
> away.  You're right to be thinking about it because people who like to 
> play with things will try to do things with it.  You might want to delay 
> declaring any api stable until after python 3.0 final is out to allow 
> time for things to be changed as better ways of doing things are found.

I completely agree that it makes sense to wait until Python 3.x is declared 
stable until we declare PyGObject/PyGTK stable.

Guido expects 3.1 and 3.2 to be released before they'll make such a 
commitment if I'm not mistaken.

Johan