Re: Proposing Tracker for inclusion into GNOME 2.18
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- Cc: Joe Shaw <joeshaw novell com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposing Tracker for inclusion into GNOME 2.18
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:24:29 +0200
Foreword: I've never used tracker, spotlight, google desktop search,
etc. I only have experience with old beagle, which was really not that
great since it crashed after a few seconds ;-)
Le jeudi 19 octobre 2006, à 20:01, Jamie McCracken a écrit :
> Joe Shaw wrote:
> > * The scope of Tracker isn't clear. Is the point to be fast
> > search for files, or for all the user's data? To what end has
> > Tracker achieved its goal?
> It should be clear - to be the best
But, to be the best at what?
I look at the website and I get this: "Tracker is a first class object
database, extensible tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer."
First reaction is "good". Second reaction is "hrm, what does it all
mean? Does it just do everything except coffee?". Should I compare this
to beagle/spotlight/etc. or not?
> > * If Tracker's aim is to index all of the user's personal
> > information (and not just files), the indexer is far too
> > immature and lacking in functionality at this point.
> tracker is mature at indexing files and does a much better job than some
> leading contenders including spotlight and other commercial indexers
> which all seem to consume significant resources. Tracker is different
> and arguably better in this area.
Don't take this wrong, but always saying "it's the best" or "it's better"
is not really helpful here, at least for me. I need arguments. I need to
know why. May I suggest you write down a page on the wiki or somewhere
to explain that? It will be much better than arguing on the mailing list
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
] [Thread Prev