Re: Gtk# in the bindings suite



On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 11:09 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> >  * Should we include Gtk# in the Bindings suite?
> >   - short term
> >   - it hasn't been proposed for 2.16, but we could grandfather it in
> >   - the release management issues have largely been solved, aside from Gtk#
> >     not being split between Platform and Desktop (stable and unstable) APIs
> >     which is pretty important in terms of ISV/ISD communication and so on
> >   - bindings are a very important part of GNOME, and our value proposition
> >   - it seems that few people are concerned about Gtk# adopting the release
> >     process and other standards, then being included in our Bindings suite
> >   - a social/business/non-technical issue may persist regarding GNOME using
> >     or endorsing a Microsoft derived technology; some users/vendors may not
> >     appreciate that, to the point that they may choose to disassociate from
> >     the GNOME project (this shouldn't be dismissed out of hand)
> 
> Definitely.
> 
> They're already widely used and they seem to be mature enough to be included
>  in the suite.
> 
> I cannot se a reason why they shouldn't if they follow the bindings/platform
> stability rules and are prepared to follow the release schedule.

100% agree.  I don't know C# and prefer Python for RAD, but Gtk# is well
tested, well maintained, well documented and well used.  There is no
reason why they should not be in Bindings.

Ross
-- 
Ross Burton                                 mail: ross burtonini com
                                          jabber: ross burtonini com
                                     www: http://www.burtonini.com./
 PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]