Re: Time to heat up the new module discussion



On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 07:55 +0200, David Nielsen wrote:
> søn, 16 07 2006 kl. 23:33 -0500, skrev Jason D. Clinton:
> 
> While you provided a fine run down of arguments, I believe you forgot a
> vital one, Mono can be optimized, we can cut down ressource consumption,
> we can indeed do better - we cannot however make C development as fast
> development in C#, nor as fun. Twice the memory consumption is as I
> understand it not the lowest common denominator but rather the worst
> case under the new garbage collector - but nobody has provided hard
> numbers for the highly contested ressource use yet.

This IS an interesting argument but this is the first time I have seen
it. But, perhaps I missed it in my review; if I did, I appologize. It
wasn't out of malice for Mono.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]