Re: Mono/GTK#/Tomboy
- From: Ben Maurer <bmaurer andrew cmu edu>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Mono/GTK#/Tomboy
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:14:03 -0400
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Murray Cumming wrote:
And while there were almost no objections to Python, there are clearly
many objections to Mono.
What objections? So far, the only two objections I've heard are:
1. Performance -- I feel that I've addressed this in other emails.
2. Vague references to TLAs such as ISV, OEM, API, ABI without refering to
specific problems. Mono provides a very strong ABI in the base class
libraries (we implement the same API as the .NET framework). For mono
specific libraries, Mono commits to a similar stability level.
Further, the objections mentioned all seem to apply equaly to python and
mono. Python is allowed for desktop apps already. If nobody can come up
with objections to mono that don't apply equally to python, it would seem
that mono and python should be on equal footing.
-- Ben
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]