Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules
- From: Chipzz <chipzz ULYSSIS Org>
- To: Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- Cc: Paolo Borelli <pborelli katamail com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:30:18 +0100 (CET)
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> Chipzz wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Paolo Borelli wrote:
> >
> >>support disabled. That said we think that python support is a really
> >>important feature and it's having a huge success (I have seen more
> >>plugins in the last month than in the last two years). I'd love that
> >
> > A comment here which not only refers to gedit, but also to those other
> > apps which are creating plugins: do we actually have a standard consis-
> > tant cross-application framework for scripting? I don't know how good
> > VBA is at this, but I think we cannot have a different approach for e-
> > very other application like gnumeric and abiword and gedit etc... Did
> > anyone actually bother to think this through?
>
> yes but we are waiting for gobject's full introspection to materialise
> to make this possible (IE it will give us language independent COM like
> functionality which is what VBA uses for scripting).
You should realize that if you release, you have a public API which you
are bound to... even more than to library API's (cause end-users are un-
likely to port...).
kr,
Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
Chipzz ULYSSIS Org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Baldric, you wouldn't recognize a subtle plan if it painted itself pur-
ple and danced naked on a harpsicord singing 'subtle plans are here a-
gain'."
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]