Re: Trying to reach consensus on g-p-e

[Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>]

On 1/12/06, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com> wrote:
> On 1/12/06, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> > On Thu, January 12, 2006 10:52, Paolo Maggi wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >       since Gustavo (g-p-e maintainer) is willing to split g-p-e in two
> > > parts:
> > > 1. modules wrapping gnome desktop libraries (let me call it
> > > gnome-python-desktop),
> > > 2. modules wrapping other libraries,
> > >
> > > can we reach consensus on allowing desktop applications to depend on
> > > what I called gnome-python-desktop and so on including
> > > gnome-python-desktop itself in desktop modules set?
> >
> > It makes sense to me, so I'm all for it.
>
> I'm in favor.  Does anyone see any issues or problems with the
> proposal?  If not, let's do it.

There have been lots of people speaking up in favor of this and no one
has objected, so let's proceed as Gustavo outlined.  :)