Re: Trying to reach consensus on g-p-e
- From: Paolo Maggi <paolo maggi polito it>
- To: "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Trying to reach consensus on g-p-e
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:58:15 +0100
Hi,
> > 1. modules wrapping gnome desktop libraries (let me call it
> > gnome-python-desktop),
>
> Yes, gnome-python-desktop is exactly the name I had in mind. :-)
Great!
>
> > 2. modules wrapping other libraries,
>
> That would remain to be called gnome-python-extras.
>
It seems ok to me.
> > If needed, I think we could further reduce the set of bindings to
> > include in gnome-python-desktop to the ones actually used by desktop
> > applications:
> > - gnome-applet (if a python-based applet will be included in desktop)
> > - gnomeprint, gnomeprint.ui, gtksourceview (conditionally required for
> > gedit python plugins)
>
> Sorry, I don't agree at all with this third alternative. While for
> gnome 2.14 maybe only gnomeapplet, gnomeprint, and gtksourceview maybe
> needed, maybe in gnome 2.XY other modules might be needed, and I don't
> like constantly shifting modules left and right. Please, let's stick to
> the plan of splitting in desktop/extras, where desktop is all dekstop
> libraries, not just the ones used by current desktop apps.
>
Yep, you are right, I did't think to this problem.
Ciao,
Paolo
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]