Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>
- To: Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:39:36 +0100
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 22:23 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 23:19 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 23:00 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> >
> > > + gnome-power-manager: I don't remember much discussion. What do you
> > > think? Is it well-tested?
> >
> > Ubuntu has been shipping this for a while, first in Breezy then in
> > Dapper; it works great for me (it enabled me to suspend my laptop by
> > closing the lid) and makes the power management a non-issue.
> >
> > > + gnome-screensaver: people want this. I'd say we should go with it and
> > > I believe it's the general consensus, but maybe some people think it's
> > > not ready yet?
> >
> > As above, gnome-screensaver works great. It makes my laptop use too
> > much power, so the fan goes like a 747 jet, but it's been a drop in
> > replacement for xscreensaver for a while.
>
> CVS g-p-m tells g-s to use a low-power version of the screensver (i.e.
> blank the screen, don't do any openGL stuff) when on battery power.
That's great news - even though my CPU's fan goes over the sound barrier
just with the photos screen saver. ;-)
Anyway, nothing that I can't live with, since if I'm going away from the
laptop for enough time to the screensaver to kick in, I usually close
its lid and suspend.
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
Emmanuele Bassi - <ebassi gmail com>
Log: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]